Re: No warning about duplicate values in enum

2023-03-13 Thread Basile Starynkevitch
On 3/13/23 14:29, Marek Polacek wrote: On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 04:48:14PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: On Sat, 11 Mar 2023, 12:53 Basile Starynkevitch, wrote: Hello all, Andrea observed that: In gcc 8.3.0, compiling enum test { FIRST = 1, SECOND = 1, THIR

Re: No warning about duplicate values in enum

2023-03-13 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 04:48:14PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote: > On Sat, 11 Mar 2023, 12:53 Basile Starynkevitch, > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > Andrea observed that: > > > > In gcc 8.3.0, compiling > > > > > > enum > > test > >{ > > FIRST = 1, > > SECOND = 1, > >

Re: No warning about duplicate values in enum

2023-03-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Sat, 11 Mar 2023, 12:53 Basile Starynkevitch, wrote: > Hello all, > > > Andrea observed that: > > In gcc 8.3.0, compiling > > > enum > test >{ > FIRST = 1, > SECOND = 1, > THIRD = 2 >}; > > int > main (void) > { >return 0; > } > > > generates no warning even with -We

Re: No warning about duplicate values in enum

2023-03-10 Thread Marek Polacek via Gcc
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 01:57:06PM +0100, Andrea Monaco via Gcc wrote: > > In gcc 8.3.0, compiling > > > enum > test > { > FIRST = 1, > SECOND = 1, > THIRD = 2 > }; > > int > main (void) > { > return 0; > } > > > generates no warning even with -Wextra. That hit me today, be