On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:29 AM Erick Ochoa wrote:
>
> Hello Richard,
>
> I have a related question. I have the following GCC program (which is
> again an altered version of ipa-pta-16.c:
>
> ```
>
> struct X
> {
> long l1;
> struct Y
> {
> long l2;
> int *p;
> } y;
> };
>
Hello Richard,
I have a related question. I have the following GCC program (which is
again an altered version of ipa-pta-16.c:
```
struct X
{
long l1;
struct Y
{
long l2;
int *p;
} y;
};
int i;
static int __attribute__((noinline))
foo (struct X *x)
{
struct Y y = x->y;
Perfect, thank you! This is exactly the answer that I was looking for.
On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 13:27, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 4:17 PM Erick Ochoa wrote:
> >
> > Hi Richard, I think I misunderstood yesterday's answer and deviated a
> > little bit. But now I want to focus
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 4:17 PM Erick Ochoa wrote:
>
> Hi Richard, I think I misunderstood yesterday's answer and deviated a
> little bit. But now I want to focus on this:
>
> > > * the process in GCC that generates the constraints for NULL works
> > > fine (i.e., feeding the constraints generated
No, I think it is correct. Any help would be clearly appreciated.
Thanks! (Even if I'm wrong, of course I'd like to know.)
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 17:21, Erick Ochoa wrote:
>
> Mm... ignore this for now please, I think I messed up the analysis by
> hand. I will try again. Thanks!
>
> On Wed, 17 Ma
Mm... ignore this for now please, I think I messed up the analysis by
hand. I will try again. Thanks!
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 16:16, Erick Ochoa wrote:
>
> Hi Richard, I think I misunderstood yesterday's answer and deviated a
> little bit. But now I want to focus on this:
>
> > > * the process in
Hi Richard, I think I misunderstood yesterday's answer and deviated a
little bit. But now I want to focus on this:
> > * the process in GCC that generates the constraints for NULL works
> > fine (i.e., feeding the constraints generated by GCC to an external
> > solver should yield a conservatively
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:34 AM Erick Ochoa via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm still trying to compare the solution generated from the
> intraprocedural points-to analysis in GCC against an external solver.
>
> Yesterday it was pointed out that "NULL is not conservatively
> correctly represented i