Re: Missed optimization of strcpy(3) (or stpcpy(3))

Hi Richard, On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 07:56:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote: > Can you file a bugreport please? It looks like a transform for the > strlen pass. Done; thanks. -- signature.asc Description

Re: Missed optimization of strcpy(3) (or stpcpy(3))

On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:10 PM Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote: > > Hi, > > The following code can be optimized to use memcpy(3), since the length > of the copy is known (we've just called strnlen(3), and discarded the > possibility of truncated lengths). > > $ cat strxcpy.c > #include > #inclu