On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 17:20 +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> >Is this still happening?
> >
> >I thought i fixed this a few days ago (the perl regex for matching prs
> >didn't translate perfectly into python)
> >
> >Can you please give me a revision number to play with?
> >
>
Daniel Berlin wrote:
>Is this still happening?
>
>I thought i fixed this a few days ago (the perl regex for matching prs
>didn't translate perfectly into python)
>
>Can you please give me a revision number to play with?
>
Sure: today 106379 fixed libstdc++/23425.
Thanks for your quick feedback!
P
Is this still happening?
I thought i fixed this a few days ago (the perl regex for matching prs
didn't translate perfectly into python)
Can you please give me a revision number to play with?
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 16:57 +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that library commits fixing
