On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 17:11, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 14:36, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 17:37, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 7:11 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 14:36, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 17:37, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 7:11 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Hongtao Liu
It seems better with your PR97872 fix on i386.
Cat test.c
typedef char v16qi __attribute__ ((vector_size(16)));
v16qi f1(v16qi a, v16qi b) {
return (a & b) != 0;
}
before
f1(char __vector(16), char __vector(16)):
pand %xmm1, %xmm0
pxor %xmm1, %xmm1
pcmpeqb %xmm1, %xmm0
pcmpeqd %xmm1, %xmm1
pand
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 14:36, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 17:37, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 7:11 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:47 PM Richard Bi
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 17:37, Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 7:11 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:47 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 7:11 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:47 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:47 PM Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 5:47 PM Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 17:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > >
>
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 17:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 13:01, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 17:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:35, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > >
> >
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 17:18, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:35, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 17:18, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:35, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 16:39, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > >
> >
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:35, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 16:39, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 1 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020 at 16:35, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 16:39, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 1 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > For the test mentioned in PR, I was trying to see if
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 16:39, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > For the test mentioned in PR, I was trying to see if we could do
> > > specialized expansion for vcond in target when oper
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 at 16:39, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > For the test mentioned in PR, I was trying to see if we could do
> > specialized expansion for vcond in target when operands are -1 and 0.
> > arm_expand_vcond gets the following ope
On Tue, 1 Dec 2020, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> For the test mentioned in PR, I was trying to see if we could do
> specialized expansion for vcond in target when operands are -1 and 0.
> arm_expand_vcond gets the following operands:
> (reg:V8QI 113 [ _2 ])
> (reg:V8QI 117)
> (reg:V8QI 118)
17 matches
Mail list logo