On 12/10/19 1:42 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 12:51 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/10/19 10:56 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 13:42 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 12:51 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 12/10/19 10:56 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > > On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > > For the adventurous/cur
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 12:51 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/10/19 10:56 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC
> > > > [1]
> > > > is
On 12/10/19 10:56 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1]
is
now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try
it
out without bui
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 09:36 -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> > For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1]
> > is
> > now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try
> > it
> > out without building it yourself. [Than
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 12:11 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 11:04 -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:46:59AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> [...]
> > > Would it make sense to add an "analyzer" component to our
> > > bugzilla,
> > > even though this is stil
On Tue, 2019-12-10 at 11:04 -0500, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:46:59AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
[...]
> > Would it make sense to add an "analyzer" component to our bugzilla,
> > even though this is still on a branch? (with me as default
> > assignee)
>
> I think so, we hav
On 12/10/19 8:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1] is
now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try it
out without building it yourself. [Thanks to Matt Godbolt, Patrick
Quist and others at the Compiler Explorer proje
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:46:59AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> For the adventurous/curious, my static analyzer branch of GCC [1] is
> now available on Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) so you can try it
> out without building it yourself. [Thanks to Matt Godbolt, Patrick
> Quist and others at
