Re: GCC Development Plan update?

2025-05-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 21:26, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 20:56, ASSI wrote: > > > > Jonathan Wakely via Gcc writes: > > > For 13.4 the link on the https://gcc.gnu.org home page for the gcc 13 > > > status goes to https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2025-April/245992.html > >

Re: GCC Development Plan update?

2025-05-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 20:56, ASSI wrote: > > Jonathan Wakely via Gcc writes: > > For 13.4 the link on the https://gcc.gnu.org home page for the gcc 13 > > status goes to https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2025-April/245992.html > > which says: > > "The plan is to do a release candidate for GCC 13.

Re: GCC Development Plan update?

2025-05-14 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 09:55:07PM +0200, ASSI wrote: > That seems appropriate for the GCC Releases document, while the one I > linked to is advertised to show "future releases and an alternative view > of the release history". But I get it that it's just not getting an > update at this time so th

Re: GCC Development Plan update?

2025-05-14 Thread ASSI
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc writes: > For 13.4 the link on the https://gcc.gnu.org home page for the gcc 13 > status goes to https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2025-April/245992.html > which says: > "The plan is to do a release candidate for GCC 13.4 on Thursday, May > 29th, one week after the GCC 14.3

Re: GCC Development Plan update?

2025-05-14 Thread ASSI
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc writes: > On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 19:12, ASSI wrote: >> >> >> The current schedule as published at >> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html >> >> ends with the 16.1 release. > > No it doesn't btw - it ends with the 15.1 release and with stage 1 for > gcc 16, we're still a year

Re: GCC Development Plan update?

2025-05-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 20:09, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 19:12, ASSI wrote: > > > > > > The current schedule as published at > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html > > > > ends with the 16.1 release. Is there an updated / extended version > > available that shows the pla

Re: GCC Development Plan update?

2025-05-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 19:12, ASSI wrote: > > > The current schedule as published at > > https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html > > ends with the 16.1 release. No it doesn't btw - it ends with the 15.1 release and with stage 1 for gcc 16, we're still a year away from the 16.1 release. > Is there an

Re: GCC Development Plan update?

2025-05-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 19:12, ASSI wrote: > > > The current schedule as published at > > https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html > > ends with the 16.1 release. Is there an updated / extended version > available that shows the planned releases for the next half year at > least? No, but you can extrapol

Re: GCC development plan

2010-01-20 Thread Ed Smith-Rowland
Piotr Wyderski wrote: Tobias Burnus wrote: Well, for the new features in the trunk: Have a look at the release notes for the upcoming version 4.5 at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html For C++ 0x (1x?) have also a look at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html Yes, I know th

Re: GCC development plan

2010-01-20 Thread Piotr Wyderski
Tobias Burnus wrote: > Well, for the new features in the trunk: Have a look at the release > notes for the upcoming version 4.5 at > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html > For C++ 0x (1x?) have also a look at > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/cxx0x_status.html Yes, I know those pages pretty well, a

Re: GCC development plan

2010-01-20 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 01/20/2010 12:17 PM, Piotr Wyderski wrote: > is there something like an unofficial documentation > of trunk features Well, for the new features in the trunk: Have a look at the release notes for the upcoming version 4.5 at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.5/changes.html For C++ 0x (1x?) have also a loo

Re: GCC development plan

2010-01-20 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 01/20/2010 12:17 PM, Piotr Wyderski wrote: > Hello, > > is there something like an unofficial documentation > of trunk features or a more or less detailed development > plan of the compiler? http://catb.org/~esr/writings/homesteading/ with the usual caveats about Open Source vs Free Softwar