On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Jack Howarth wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:23:36PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > Status
> > ==
> >
> > The GCC 4.7 branch is ready for a release candidate of GCC 4.7.3
> > which I will do tomorrow if no serious issue shows up until then.
> > The branch is fro
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:23:36PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Status
> ==
>
> The GCC 4.7 branch is ready for a release candidate of GCC 4.7.3
> which I will do tomorrow if no serious issue shows up until then.
> The branch is frozen now, all changes require release manager approval
> u
On 4/3/2013 8:36 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Joel Sherrill wrote:
The RTEMS Community would like to squeeze pr56771 in. It only got a fix in the
past few days. It is a one line arm-rtems specific path to libcpp configure.
Can I commit that?
Sure, if it got RTEMS maintainer
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> The RTEMS Community would like to squeeze pr56771 in. It only got a fix in
> the past few days. It is a one line arm-rtems specific path to libcpp
> configure.
>
> Can I commit that?
Sure, if it got RTEMS maintainer approval.
Richard.
> --joel
> RTE
The RTEMS Community would like to squeeze pr56771 in. It only got a fix in the
past few days. It is a one line arm-rtems specific path to libcpp configure.
Can I commit that?
--joel
RTEMS
Richard Biener wrote:
Status
==
The GCC 4.7 branch is ready for a release candidate of GCC 4.7.3
wh