Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Kai Henningsen wrote: > Am Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:30:44 + (UTC) > schrieb "Joseph S. Myers" : > > > There are a total of 5150 open bugs in Bugzilla, counting both > > regressions and non-regressions. It seems quite likely that many of > > the older bugs have in fact been fi

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

Am Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:30:44 + (UTC) schrieb "Joseph S. Myers" : > There are a total of 5150 open bugs in Bugzilla, counting both > regressions and non-regressions. It seems quite likely that many of > the older bugs have in fact been fixed since they were filed, but we > don't have any good

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Jeff Law wrote: > Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > Vladimir, have you had chance to look at supporting > > LOAD_EXTEND_OP (implicit sign-extension) in IRA? > > > > > > > > I'm guessing no, but hope it's not forgotten. > > > > I inte

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Vladimir Makarov wrote: Today Jeff Law (many thanks to him!) approved a big patch I wanted to commit before submitting patch removing the old register allocator. So nothing prevents to remove the old RA. I am going to submit the patch removing t

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The other issue that remains is removing the old register allocator. > Vladimir, it's time to do this. What -- if anything -- is preventing > that? What about sched-ebb? Wasn't that supposed to be removed after the select

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > Vladimir, have you had chance to look at supporting > > LOAD_EXTEND_OP (implicit sign-extension) in IRA? > > > > I'm guessing no, but hope it's not forgotten. > It seems I m

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Vladimir Makarov wrote: Today Jeff Law (many thanks to him!) approved a big patch I wanted to commit before submitting patch removing the old register allocator. So nothing prevents to remove the old RA. I am going to submit the patch removing t

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

On Tue, 9 Dec 2008, Vladimir Makarov wrote: > Today Jeff Law (many thanks to him!) approved a big patch I wanted to commit > before submitting patch removing the old register allocator. So nothing > prevents to remove the old RA. > > I am going to submit the patch removing the old RA for review to

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

Mark Mitchell wrote: Status == The trunk remains Stage 4, so only fixes for regressions (and changes to documentation) are allowed. As stated previously, the GCC 4.4 branch will be created when there are no open P1s and the total number of P1, P2, and P3 regressions is under 100. We're clo

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

Martin Guy wrote: On 12/9/08, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37440 Can Ada build on any Arm platform? The only existing GNAT Ada compiler I could find for ARM (while thinking about doing it for the new Debian eabi port) is Adacor

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

On 12/9/08, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37440 > > Can Ada build on any Arm platform? The only existing GNAT Ada compiler I could find for ARM (while thinking about doing it for the new Debian eabi port) is Adacore's Windows->Nucleus OS c

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

Richard Guenther wrote: On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Is this one in the list? http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37440 Can Ada build on any Arm platform? arm-rtems had good test results for 4.3.2 but broke a few months ago. I suspec

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Is this one in the list? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37440 > > Can Ada build on any Arm platform? arm-rtems had > good test results for 4.3.2 but broke a few months ago. > I suspect it doesn't bu

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

Hi, Is this one in the list? http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37440 Can Ada build on any Arm platform? arm-rtems had good test results for 4.3.2 but broke a few months ago. I suspect it doesn't build targeting any Arm. And I doubt this one is on the list but I am convinced somethin

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Unconverted targets will be added to the deprecation list when the old > allocator is removed, and removed from trunk along with the other > deprecated targets shortly after 4.4 branches; until then, target > maintainers may remove them from the deprecation list as part of

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

Jeff Law wrote: Joseph S. Myers wrote: Vladimir, is there any news on the patch to remove the old allocator since , or on getting m32c and IRA working together? Vlad is relatively busy dealing with PRs as they're reported, the optimization reg

Re: GCC 4.4.0 Status Report (2008-11-27)

Joseph S. Myers wrote: Vladimir, is there any news on the patch to remove the old allocator since , or on getting m32c and IRA working together? Vlad is relatively busy dealing with PRs as they're reported, the optimization regressions in parti