On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, John David Anglin wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > It's not my turn to send a status report, but as I plan doing a release
> > candidate for GCC 4.3.3 soon I thought a status report for that would
> > be in order.
>
> Sorry Richard, I didn't see th
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Richard Guenther wrote:
> It's not my turn to send a status report, but as I plan doing a release
> candidate for GCC 4.3.3 soon I thought a status report for that would
> be in order.
Sorry Richard, I didn't see this until too late. I committed three
PA changes this morning
> Richard,
>
> I would like to revert the cause of the regression reported yesterday
> in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00197.html - I'll do it in
> the next hour, if that is alright?
>
> Cheers
>
> Paul
Duly reverted on trunk and 4.3.
Paul
Richard,
I would like to revert the cause of the regression reported yesterday
in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-01/msg00197.html - I'll do it in
the next hour, if that is alright?
Cheers
Paul
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 12:03 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> It's not my turn to send a status r
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > It's not my turn to send a status report, but as I plan doing a release
> > candidate for GCC 4.3.3 soon I thought a status report for that would
> > be in order.
> >
> > Status
> > ==
> >
>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> It's not my turn to send a status report, but as I plan doing a release
> candidate for GCC 4.3.3 soon I thought a status report for that would
> be in order.
>
> Status
> ==
>
> The GCC 4.3 branch is now frozen in preparation for a
