Jie Zhang wrote:
On 8/10/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2
that they are having trouble getting reviewed? Any comments
re. timing for Stage 3?
I have many bfin port patches which have not been merged into
upstre
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/08/2007 17:19:13:
>
> Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2
> that they are having trouble getting reviewed?
struct-reorg + ipa-type-escape changes are awaiting for response.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-0
On 8/10/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2
> that they are having trouble getting reviewed? Any comments
> re. timing for Stage 3?
>
I have many bfin port patches which have not been merged into
upstream. I hope I c
> Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > One thing I would like to see in is the sharing checker. The criteria
> > of bootstrap/regtesting on primary platforms is almost met now with
> > exception of regmove pass that I sent patch for some time ago.
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01441.html
>
Jan Hubicka wrote:
> One thing I would like to see in is the sharing checker. The criteria
> of bootstrap/regtesting on primary platforms is almost met now with
> exception of regmove pass that I sent patch for some time ago.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01441.html
> I will do r
>
> Summary
> ---
>
> We entered Stage 2 on July 6th. I plan to put us into Stage 3 on
> September 10th. At that point, we will accept only bug-fixes -- no
> more new features until Stage 1 for GCC 4.4.
>
> Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2
> that they
We have a lot of patches to the ARC port, but I suppose that would not really
be a problem for phase three, as the current arc port in the gcc mainline
is not really useful for end users - it doesn't support any of the cores
that have been released in recent years.
Some patches belong logically to
Hello,
> > Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2
> > that they are having trouble getting reviewed? Any comments
> > re. timing for Stage 3?
>
> Zadeck has the parloop branch patches, which I've been reviewing. I am
> not sure how many other patches are left, bu
On 8/10/07 9:49 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Zadeck has the parloop branch patches [ ... ]
Sorry, I meant Zdenek.
On 8/9/07 6:19 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Are there any folks out there who have projects for Stage 1 or Stage 2
> that they are having trouble getting reviewed? Any comments
> re. timing for Stage 3?
Zadeck has the parloop branch patches, which I've been reviewing. I am
not sure how many other
10 matches
Mail list logo
