Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-24 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Gerald Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Robert Schwebel wrote: | > I don't understand yet how the next steps for 4.2 will look like; will | > there be further snapshots (ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/) of the | > 4.2 branch, or will the next snapshots be only for 4.

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-24 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Robert Schwebel wrote: > I don't understand yet how the next steps for 4.2 will look like; will > there be further snapshots (ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/) of the > 4.2 branch, or will the next snapshots be only for 4.3? The GCC 4.2 snapshots will now track the 4.2 rel

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-24 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 08:41:37PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > I have created the GCC 4.2 branch. I don't understand yet how the next steps for 4.2 will look like; will there be further snapshots (ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/) of the 4.2 branch, or will the next snapshots be only for 4.3

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-23 Thread Mark Mitchell
Daniel Berlin wrote: Anyway, i made 43changer.pl and ran it, so the bug summaries have been updated. Thanks! -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-23 Thread Daniel Berlin
>> As I understand it, it involves editing the mysql database by hand (well >> by a script) instead of doing it inside bugzilla. Daniel Berlin has >> done that the last couple of releases. > > I have checked in the attached patch to add this step to the branching > checklist. I will now ask Dani

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-23 Thread Mark Mitchell
Mark Mitchell wrote: Andrew Pinski wrote: On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 12:58 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: All the bugs with "4.2" in their summaries ("[4.1/4.2 Regression]" etc.) need to have it changed to "4.2/4.3". I don't know the procedure for this, but perhaps it needs adding to the branching

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-23 Thread Mark Mitchell
Andrew Pinski wrote: On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 12:58 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: All the bugs with "4.2" in their summaries ("[4.1/4.2 Regression]" etc.) need to have it changed to "4.2/4.3". I don't know the procedure for this, but perhaps it needs adding to the branching checklist. As I unde

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-22 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Sun, 2006-10-22 at 12:58 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > All the bugs with "4.2" in their summaries ("[4.1/4.2 Regression]" etc.) > need to have it changed to "4.2/4.3". I don't know the procedure for > this, but perhaps it needs adding to the branching checklist. As I understand it, it invo

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-22 Thread Joseph S. Myers
All the bugs with "4.2" in their summaries ("[4.1/4.2 Regression]" etc.) need to have it changed to "4.2/4.3". I don't know the procedure for this, but perhaps it needs adding to the branching checklist. -- Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GCC 4.2 branch created; mainline open in Stage 1

2006-10-22 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Mark Mitchell wrote: > 2. I have not regenerated {gcc,cpplib}.pot, or sent them off to the > translation project. Joseph, would you please do that, at your convenience? Regeneration done. I'll submit the next 4.2 snapshot to the TP. -- Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]