Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
My first comment is that we had a lot of bugs targeted at 4.1.0 that
should never have been so targeted. Please remember that bugs that do
not effect primary or secondary targets should not have a target
milestone. There are s
Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My first comment is that we had a lot of bugs targeted at 4.1.0 that
> should never have been so targeted. Please remember that bugs that do
> not effect primary or secondary targets should not have a target
> milestone. There are several PRs that seem
Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Aug 22, 2005, at 1:27 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
(Quite a few of the diagnostic messages
stem from the design decision to issue warnings from the
optimizers...)
Only 8 out of 49 at that, though some are very minor as two are just
complaining wording of the warning.
I
On Aug 22, 2005, at 1:27 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
(Quite a few of the diagnostic messages
stem from the design decision to issue warnings from the
optimizers...)
Only 8 out of 49 at that, though some are very minor as two are just
complaining wording of the warning. And almost all are uninit
