On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 11:05 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Thanks for the summary. It sounds from your message, and particularly
> the quote from RMS, that we should be accepting the patches unless we
> have a particular reason not to trust MIPS to do what they said they'd
> do. I certainly ha
Richard Sandiford wrote:
Thanks for the summary. It sounds from your message, and particularly
the quote from RMS, that we should be accepting the patches unless we
have a particular reason not to trust MIPS to do what they said they'd
do.
I'm hesitant to color it too strongly, in that I had a
Thanks for the summary. It sounds from your message, and particularly
the quote from RMS, that we should be accepting the patches unless we
have a particular reason not to trust MIPS to do what they said they'd
do. I certainly have no reason not to trust MIPS, so I guess that
means the patches ca
