Re: DWZ 0.14 released

2021-03-12 Thread Nick Alcock via Gcc
On 9 Mar 2021, Jakub Jelinek via Binutils spake thusly: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:38:07AM +, Hannes Domani via Dwz wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 9. März 2021, 10:10:47 MEZ hat Mark Wielaard >> Folgendes geschrieben: >> >> > Hi Allan, >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:06:54AM +0100, Allan Sa

Re: DWZ 0.14 released

2021-03-09 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 11:38:07AM +, Hannes Domani via Dwz wrote: > Am Dienstag, 9. März 2021, 10:10:47 MEZ hat Mark Wielaard > Folgendes geschrieben: > > > Hi Allan, > > > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:06:54AM +0100, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > > Btw, question for gcc/binutils > > > >

Re: DWZ 0.14 released

2021-03-09 Thread Hannes Domani via Gcc
Am Dienstag, 9. März 2021, 10:10:47 MEZ hat Mark Wielaard Folgendes geschrieben: > Hi Allan, > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:06:54AM +0100, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > > Btw, question for gcc/binutils > > > > Any reason the work done by tools like dwz couldn't be done in the compiler > > or

Re: DWZ 0.14 released

2021-03-09 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Allan, On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 09:06:54AM +0100, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > Btw, question for gcc/binutils > > Any reason the work done by tools like dwz couldn't be done in the compiler > or > linker? Seems a bit odd to have a post-linker that optimizes the generated > code, when optim

Re: DWZ 0.14 released

2021-03-09 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
Btw, question for gcc/binutils Any reason the work done by tools like dwz couldn't be done in the compiler or linker? Seems a bit odd to have a post-linker that optimizes the generated code, when optimizations should already be enabled. Best regards Allan On Montag, 8. März 2021 13:43:11 CET T