Hi Eli,
Corinna has asked me to take a look at your bug report[1] on this
problem (since she has now encountered it in an Cygwin environment).
Unfortunately I am not an x86 expert so I am not really able to dig
deeply into it. But what I would recommend is filing an official gcc
bug report
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> My question was: is this expected? Does a program that loads the
> shared libgcc in mid-flight need to be linked with -shared-libgcc
> flag? Or is this some bug in libgcc?
I don't think anybody knows the answer to that.
I doubt the behav
> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:45:10 -0700
> From: Ian Lance Taylor
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>
> I know very little about how these things work on Windows. However,
> it is fairly likely that full support for throwing exceptions across
> shared libraries on Windows does require using a shared libgcc.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 21:19:24 +0300
>> From: Eli Zaretskii
>> CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> > Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 06:37:31 -0700
>> > From: Ian Lance Taylor
>> > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>> >
>> > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 21:19:24 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii
> CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>
> > Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 06:37:31 -0700
> > From: Ian Lance Taylor
> > Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> >
> > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > >> I don't see any obvious bug in the code. Evid
> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 12:18:29 +0200
> From: Kai Tietz
> Cc: Ian Lance Taylor , gcc Mailing List
>
> The issue is there that after an unload of libgcc on pe-coff, the
> function __decregister_frame_info_bases might be not called.
That's probably true (assuming that cygming-crtbegin.c decided
> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 06:37:31 -0700
> From: Ian Lance Taylor
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> I don't see any obvious bug in the code. Evidently
> >> something is going wrong, but the e-mail messages you linked to don't
> >> provide enough
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 17:48:06 -0700
>> From: Ian Lance Taylor
>>
>> It is not a fundamental bug to depend on libgcc as a shared library.
>> The libgcc code is trying to do the right thing when the library is
>> unloaded. I don't see any
2013/5/20 Eli Zaretskii :
>> Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 17:48:06 -0700
>> From: Ian Lance Taylor
>> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>>
>> It is not a fundamental bug to depend on libgcc as a shared library.
>> The libgcc code is trying to do the right thing when the library is
>> unloaded. I don't see any obviou
> Date: Sun, 19 May 2013 17:48:06 -0700
> From: Ian Lance Taylor
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>
> It is not a fundamental bug to depend on libgcc as a shared library.
> The libgcc code is trying to do the right thing when the library is
> unloaded. I don't see any obvious bug in the code. Evidently
>
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> Would someone on the developers' team please comment on this problem:
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-05/msg00413.html
>
> In a nutshell, loading a GnuTLS DLL by a MinGW compiled Emacs causes
> libintl DLL to be lo
11 matches
Mail list logo
