Re: Concurrency items in C++11 status table

2012-04-14 Thread Lawrence Crowl
On 4/13/12, Torvald Riegel wrote: > On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:46 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > The table at http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html indicates > > most of the concurrency work is not done, but I think the status > > is better than it shows. > > > > If I'm not mistaken strong CAS a

Re: Concurrency items in C++11 status table

2012-04-13 Thread Torvald Riegel
On Fri, 2012-04-13 at 10:46 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The table at http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html indicates most of > the concurrency work is not done, but I think the status is better > than it shows. > > If I'm not mistaken strong CAS and bidirectional fences are done. > > Does an