Re: Building libstdc++ with current glibc, NULL and pthread.h

2012-03-09 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Roland McGrath wrote: > The change seems fine. But I think the log entry should have an explicit > pointer to the POSIX interpretation citation by way of rationale. I've committed it with references in the log to https://www.opengroup.org/sophocles/show_mail.tpl?CALLER=index

Re: Building libstdc++ with current glibc, NULL and pthread.h

2012-03-09 Thread Roland McGrath
The change seems fine. But I think the log entry should have an explicit pointer to the POSIX interpretation citation by way of rationale. Thanks, Roland

Re: Building libstdc++ with current glibc, NULL and pthread.h

2012-03-09 Thread Joseph S. Myers
The answer from the Austin Group list was that the POSIX requirement *does* mean all symbols from time.h are to be defined by pthread.h and it's a bug in the change history that it refers to allowing rather than requiring the symbols to be made visible. Thus, I propose this patch to make pthread.h