On 01/16/2016 01:56 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:13:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 01/13/2016 03:04 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:11:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
I still don't understand why you c
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 05:13:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On 01/13/2016 03:04 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:11:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>>I still don't understand why you can't use fstack-usage. Can you plea
On 01/13/2016 03:04 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:11:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
Will,
On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/16 14
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:11:29PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> Will,
>
> On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >>>On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> O
On 01/12/2016 05:22 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
-fstack-usage does not work when there are VLAs or alloca's. So there
is no way to figure that part out without analysis of the actual
assembly code.
No, -fstack-usage always works, i.e. its o
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> -fstack-usage does not work when there are VLAs or alloca's. So there
>> is no way to figure that part out without analysis of the actual
>> assembly code.
>
> No, -fstack-usage always works, i.e. its output can always be relied upon;
> wh
> -fstack-usage does not work when there are VLAs or alloca's. So there
> is no way to figure that part out without analysis of the actual
> assembly code.
No, -fstack-usage always works, i.e. its output can always be relied upon;
when it cannot compute the maximum stack usage, it prints "unbound
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:11 PM, AKASHI Takahiro
wrote:
> Will,
>
>
> On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
>
Will,
On 01/09/2016 12:53 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 04:57:54PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
So I'd like to intr
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:36:32PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
> >>On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 04:57:54PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> >>>So I'd like to introduce a function prologue analyzer to dete
On 01/07/2016 11:56 PM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 07/01/16 14:22, Will Deacon wrote:
Akashi,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 04:57:54PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
I'm the author of ftrace support on arm64(aarch64) linux. As part of
ftrace, we can utilize "stack tracer" which reports the ma
11 matches
Mail list logo
