Re: [GSoC] TYPE stringfied in call to add_operator

2014-04-25 Thread Richard Biener
On April 25, 2014 6:56:00 PM CEST, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: >On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Richard Biener > wrote: >> On April 25, 2014 4:54:28 PM CEST, Prathamesh Kulkarni > wrote: >>>Hi, >>>I have a daft question to ask. I was looking through genmatch, I >>>couldn't figure out why is

Re: [GSoC] TYPE stringfied in call to add_operator

2014-04-25 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > On April 25, 2014 4:54:28 PM CEST, Prathamesh Kulkarni > wrote: >>Hi, >>I have a daft question to ask. I was looking through genmatch, I >>couldn't figure out why is tree code class (TYPE) stringified in call >>to add_operator () ? >>

Re: [GSoC] TYPE stringfied in call to add_operator

2014-04-25 Thread Richard Biener
On April 25, 2014 4:54:28 PM CEST, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote: >Hi, >I have a daft question to ask. I was looking through genmatch, I >couldn't figure out why is tree code class (TYPE) stringified in call >to add_operator () ? > >#define DEFTREECODE (SYM, STRING, TYPE, NARGS) \ >add_operat