David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have a a mipsel-linux cross compiler (gcc-3.4.3/binutils-2.16.1) and
> whenever I compile even the simplest hello-world.c libgcc_s.so is linked.
FWIW, I'm seeing the same thing with a similar native setup.
I hope to have a look at it soon.
Richard
H. J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 01:54:40PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
Do you know of a patch to binutils since 2.16.1 that would fix the problem?
I remember there were some patches for as needed. But I don't know if
they are in 2.16.1 or not.
HEAD also seems to fail.
David Daney.
On Thursday 28 July 2005 08:22 pm, James E Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:58, Greg Schafer wrote:
> > Glibc headers ARE provided -> inhibit_libc NOT defined -> optimal
> > Glibc headers ARE NOT provided -> inhibit_libc IS defined -> suboptimal
>
> This is basically what I meant, but I d
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 01:54:40PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>
> Do you know of a patch to binutils since 2.16.1 that would fix the problem?
>
I remember there were some patches for as needed. But I don't know if
they are in 2.16.1 or not.
H.J.
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:58, Greg Schafer wrote:
> Glibc headers ARE provided -> inhibit_libc NOT defined -> optimal
> Glibc headers ARE NOT provided -> inhibit_libc IS defined -> suboptimal
This is basically what I meant, but I don't want to get in a debate
about what is optimal and what isn't
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 02:26:16PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote:
> It looks like you forgot to check the crt*.o files for undefined
> references.
>
> If the gcc/glibc toolchain wasn't built the optimal way, it is possible
> for crtbegin.o to have register_frame_info and deregister_frame_info
> cal
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 02:26:16PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 12:48, David Daney wrote:
> > Also you can see that neither hello-world.o nor my libc-2.3.3.so have
> > any undefined symbols that would be satisfied by libgcc_s.so.
>
> It looks like you forgot to check the c
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 12:48, David Daney wrote:
> Also you can see that neither hello-world.o nor my libc-2.3.3.so have
> any undefined symbols that would be satisfied by libgcc_s.so.
It looks like you forgot to check the crt*.o files for undefined
references.
If the gcc/glibc toolchain wasn't b
H. J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:48:31PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
I am not sure if this is a GCC problem or a binutils problem.
I have a a mipsel-linux cross compiler (gcc-3.4.3/binutils-2.16.1) and
whenever I compile even the simplest hello-world.c libgcc_s.so is linked.
When I
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:48:31PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> I am not sure if this is a GCC problem or a binutils problem.
>
> I have a a mipsel-linux cross compiler (gcc-3.4.3/binutils-2.16.1) and
> whenever I compile even the simplest hello-world.c libgcc_s.so is linked.
>
> When I do the sa
I am not sure if this is a GCC problem or a binutils problem.
I have a a mipsel-linux cross compiler (gcc-3.4.3/binutils-2.16.1) and
whenever I compile even the simplest hello-world.c libgcc_s.so is linked.
When I do the same thing natively on my i686/FC3, libgcc_s.so is not linked.
If if exp
11 matches
Mail list logo
