Re: RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-13 Thread Diego Novillo
On 5/12/08 1:21 PM, David Daney wrote: For mipsel-linux: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-05/msg01055.html Thanks. The complete bootstrap/test cycle seems to be about 10% faster than on the trunk. I didn't try to figure out why, although I can speculate that it is due to the fac

Re: RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-12 Thread David Daney
Diego Novillo wrote: The tuples branch is at the point now that it should bootstrap all primary languages and targets. There are things that are still broken and being worked on (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/tuples), but by and large things should Just Work. I expect things like code generation

Re: RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-10 Thread Diego Novillo
On 5/9/08 4:32 PM, Kaz Kojima wrote: * config/sh/sh.c (sh_gimplify_va_arg_expr): Change pre_p and post_p types to gimple_seq *. Thanks. This is certainly OK. Diego.

Re: RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-09 Thread Kaz Kojima
Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, for folks with free cycles to spare, could you build the branch on > your favourite target and report bugs? Bugzilla and/or email reports > are OK. If you are creating a bugzilla report, please add my address to > the CC field. With the attached

Re: RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-08 Thread Aldy Hernandez
> "Diego" == Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > are OK. If you are creating a bugzilla report, please add my address > to the CC field. Me too please. Aldy

RFH: Building and testing gimple-tuples-branch

2008-05-08 Thread Diego Novillo
The tuples branch is at the point now that it should bootstrap all primary languages and targets. There are things that are still broken and being worked on (http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/tuples), but by and large things should Just Work. I expect things like code generation to be sub-par because