On Sep 16, 2005, at 3:23 AM, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
Devang Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I've now patch ready (based on apple-local-200502-branch) but it
requires few bug fixes in darwin GDB. My simple question is : Is
anybody interested in reviewing this GCC patch for acceptance in FSF
Devang Patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've now patch ready (based on apple-local-200502-branch) but it
> requires few bug fixes in darwin GDB. My simple question is : Is
> anybody interested in reviewing this GCC patch for acceptance in FSF
> GCC (4.1 or 4.2 or whenever) irrespective of wheth
The only issue I can see is that someone who uses an older versions
of Mac OS X but don't have
access to the newer GDB because building Apple's version of GDB is
a little harder than
building than gcc. If you provide a gdb version which is runnable
on All of Mac OS X,
this becomes a littl
On Sep 15, 2005, at 2:26 PM, Devang Patel wrote:
I've now patch ready (based on apple-local-200502-branch) but it
requires few bug fixes in darwin GDB. My simple question is : Is
anybody interested in reviewing this GCC patch for acceptance in FSF
GCC (4.1 or 4.2 or whenever) irrespective of
GCC routinely puts on the fly type description in other stabs. For
example,
006c - 00 0002 PSYM argv:p(0,2)=*(0,3)=*(0,4)=r(0,4);0;127;
Now when this PSYM stab is discarded by linker the useful type info
is lost. This happens a lot in -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols mode.
It happ
