Re: RFC: REG_LABEL not sufficient, cbranchM4 causes ambiguity

2005-12-12 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 08:35:41 +0100 > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ... the JUMP_LABEL field in a JUMP_P ... Almost-consistent typo: s/JUMP_LABEL/JUMP_TARGET/g to hopefully make a little bit more sense of it all. (Attempting a brain-dump before shuteyes always has some defe

RFC: REG_LABEL not sufficient, cbranchM4 causes ambiguity

2005-12-11 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
For once, the documentation seems to be most accurate; more accurate than random comments in the code, of which some contradicts other code: @item REG_LABEL This insn uses @var{op}, a @code{code_label} or a @code{note} of type @code{NOTE_INSN_DELETED_LABEL}, but is not a @code{jump_insn}, or it is