Re: REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P

2010-10-25 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Paul Koning writes: > Working on the pdp11 target, I ran into something odd. > > It defines REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P in a way that seems to match what gccint says > one should do in the "strict" case -- but does so all the time. > Specifically, it says: > > #d

REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P

2010-10-25 Thread Paul Koning
Working on the pdp11 target, I ran into something odd. It defines REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P in a way that seems to match what gccint says one should do in the "strict" case -- but does so all the time. Specifically, it says: #define REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P(REGNO) \ ((REGNO) < 8