> From: Lawrence Crowl [mailto:cr...@google.com]
>
> On 8/20/09, Boehm, Hans wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Lawrence Crowl [mailto:cr...@google.com] The
> problem is that
> > > gcc does support 80386. It also supports other
> processors that have
> > > less-than-complet
On 8/20/09, Boehm, Hans wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lawrence Crowl [mailto:cr...@google.com]
> > The problem is that gcc does support 80386. It also supports
> > other processors that have less-than-complete support for
> > concurrency. Just in the x86 line, we get some addit
> -Original Message-
> From: Lawrence Crowl [mailto:cr...@google.com]
> The problem is that gcc does support 80386. It also supports
> other processors that have less-than-complete support for
> concurrency. Just in the x86 line, we get some additional
> capability in many new laye
