RE: [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT

2006-07-27 Thread Danny Smith
> > Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:46:36 +1200 > > From: Danny Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > From: Mark Kettenis > > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:34 AM > > > > > The best thing to do is probably to define > > > DWARF2_FRAME_REG_OUT to always use the SVR4 register map. > > > > Thanks for that a

Re: [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT

2006-07-26 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:46:36 +1200 > From: Danny Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Mark Kettenis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:34 AM > > > The best thing to do is probably to define > > DWARF2_FRAME_REG_OUT to always use the SVR4 register map. > > Thanks fo

Re: [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT

2006-07-26 Thread Mark Kettenis
> Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:00:55 +1200 > From: Danny Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Any other ideas? What is likely GDB fallout? GDB by default uses the SVR4 register numbering for DWARF & DWARF 2, and the old dbx register numbering scheme for other debugging formats (most notably stabs). Mixin