Mingjie Xing wrote:
> 2011/2/18 Fu, Chao-Ying :
> > I think your analysis is correct. We should just delete
> mips_order_regs_for_local_alloc()
> > in mips.c and delete ADJUST_REG_ALLOC_ORDER in mips.h.
> > Then, 3 accumulators can be used in dspr2-MULT.c and
> dspr2-MULTU.c now. Thanks!
>
> /
2011/2/18 Fu, Chao-Ying :
> I think your analysis is correct. We should just delete
> mips_order_regs_for_local_alloc()
> in mips.c and delete ADJUST_REG_ALLOC_ORDER in mips.h.
> Then, 3 accumulators can be used in dspr2-MULT.c and dspr2-MULTU.c now.
> Thanks!
/* ADJUST_REG_ALLOC_ORDER is a ma
Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> I analyzed this testcase regression a while earlier; the
> direct cause of
> this is due to mips_order_regs_for_local_alloc(), which now serves as
> MIPS' ADJUST_REG_ALLOC_ORDER macro.
>
> The mips_order_regs_for_local_alloc() function seems to be written for
> the old loc
2011/1/7 Chung-Lin Tang :
> I analyzed this testcase regression a while earlier; the direct cause of
> this is due to mips_order_regs_for_local_alloc(), which now serves as
> MIPS' ADJUST_REG_ALLOC_ORDER macro.
>
> The mips_order_regs_for_local_alloc() function seems to be written for
> the old loc
On 2010/12/31 09:38 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Mingjie Xing writes:
>> There are two test cases failed when run 'make check-gcc
>> RUNTESTFLAGS="mips.exp"'. The log is,
>>
>> Executing on host: /home/xmj/tools/build-test-trunk-mips/gcc/xgcc
>> -B/home/xmj/tools/build-test-trunk-mips/gcc/
>> /
Mingjie Xing writes:
> There are two test cases failed when run 'make check-gcc
> RUNTESTFLAGS="mips.exp"'. The log is,
>
> Executing on host: /home/xmj/tools/build-test-trunk-mips/gcc/xgcc
> -B/home/xmj/tools/build-test-trunk-mips/gcc/
> /home/xmj/tools/test-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/mips/d
