On 06/09/2023 15:03, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> On 6 Sep 2023, at 13:43, Richard Sandiford via Gcc wrote:
>>
>> Iain Sandoe writes:
>
>>> On the Darwin aarch64 port, we have a number of cleanup test fails (pretty
>>> much corresponding to the [still open]
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bu
Hi Richard,
> On 6 Sep 2023, at 13:43, Richard Sandiford via Gcc wrote:
>
> Iain Sandoe writes:
>> On the Darwin aarch64 port, we have a number of cleanup test fails (pretty
>> much corresponding to the [still open]
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244). However, let’s assu
Iain Sandoe writes:
> Hi Folks,
>
> On the Darwin aarch64 port, we have a number of cleanup test fails (pretty
> much corresponding to the [still open]
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244). However, let’s assume
> that bug could be a red herring..
>
> the underlying reason is
Hi Folks,
On the Darwin aarch64 port, we have a number of cleanup test fails (pretty much
corresponding to the [still open]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244). However, let’s assume
that bug could be a red herring..
the underlying reason is missing CFI for the set of the FP w
