: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:29 PM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: Re: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function
"Iyer, Balaji V" writes:
> Can I submit a patch for it? Or is it a small thing that patch is not
> necessary?
I will preapprove suc
iday, October 14, 2011 12:38 AM
> To: Iyer, Balaji V
> Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'
> Subject: Re: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function
>
> "Iyer, Balaji V" writes:
>
>> This email is in reference to the "default_elf_asm_named_sectio
Can I submit a patch for it? Or is it a small thing that patch is not necessary?
Thanks,
Balaji V. Iyer.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:i...@google.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 12:38 AM
To: Iyer, Balaji V
Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org'
Subject: Re: Ques
"Iyer, Balaji V" writes:
> This email is in reference to the "default_elf_asm_named_section"
> function in the varasm.c file.
>
> This function is defined like this:
>
> void
> default_elf_asm_named_section (const char *name, unsigned int flags,
>tree decl
Hello Everyone,
This email is in reference to the "default_elf_asm_named_section"
function in the varasm.c file.
This function is defined like this:
void
default_elf_asm_named_section (const char *name, unsigned int flags,
tree decl ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
But