RE: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function

2011-10-14 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:29 PM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org' Subject: Re: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function "Iyer, Balaji V" writes: > Can I submit a patch for it? Or is it a small thing that patch is not > necessary? I will preapprove suc

Re: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function

2011-10-14 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
iday, October 14, 2011 12:38 AM > To: Iyer, Balaji V > Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org' > Subject: Re: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function > > "Iyer, Balaji V" writes: > >> This email is in reference to the "default_elf_asm_named_sectio

RE: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function

2011-10-14 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Can I submit a patch for it? Or is it a small thing that patch is not necessary? Thanks, Balaji V. Iyer. -Original Message- From: Ian Lance Taylor [mailto:i...@google.com] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 12:38 AM To: Iyer, Balaji V Cc: 'gcc@gcc.gnu.org' Subject: Re: Ques

Re: Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function

2011-10-13 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
"Iyer, Balaji V" writes: > This email is in reference to the "default_elf_asm_named_section" > function in the varasm.c file. > > This function is defined like this: > > void > default_elf_asm_named_section (const char *name, unsigned int flags, >tree decl

Question about default_elf_asm_named_section function

2011-10-12 Thread Iyer, Balaji V
Hello Everyone, This email is in reference to the "default_elf_asm_named_section" function in the varasm.c file. This function is defined like this: void default_elf_asm_named_section (const char *name, unsigned int flags, tree decl ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED) But