Steven J. Hill wrote:
While I am getting closer to full toolchain build, GCC-4.1.0 is still
not behaving the way it should. Below is the output that I am running
up against. I attempted to define a stack variable to hold the value
of zero and tried using that instead of the actual value, but nothin
> the patch just for the sake of discussion. Does anyone have some
> insight on this? I am using binutils-2.15, glibc-2.3.4, 2.6.12-rc2
> kernel headers and gcc-4.1.0-20050418. Thanks.
>
I'd use 2.16 binutils, especially if using mainline gcc, but that's not
as relevant here...
> /home/sjhill/m
Greetings.
While I am getting closer to full toolchain build, GCC-4.1.0 is still
not behaving the way it should. Below is the output that I am running
up against. I attempted to define a stack variable to hold the value
of zero and tried using that instead of the actual value, but nothing
worked. I
