>On 3/12/07, Unruh, Erwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> In a private port I had the problem that reg_equiv_alt_mem_list did
>> contain the same RTL as reg_equiv_memory_loc. This caused an assert
in
>> delete_output_reload, where these are compared with equal_rtx_p.
>> The list is build with push_
On 3/12/07, Unruh, Erwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In a private port I had the problem that reg_equiv_alt_mem_list did
contain the
same RTL as reg_equiv_memory_loc. This caused an assert in
delete_output_reload,
where these are compared with equal_rtx_p.
The list is build with push_reg_equiv_alt
In a private port I had the problem that reg_equiv_alt_mem_list did
contain the
same RTL as reg_equiv_memory_loc. This caused an assert in
delete_output_reload,
where these are compared with equal_rtx_p.
The list is build with push_reg_equiv_alt_mem, but only when "tem !=
orig". The
value tem is bu
