Hello Ian,
On 28.12.10 06:37, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Seems like you don't have a cbranchMODE4 insn in the required mode.
Double check that. You should only get to that assert if there is no
cbranch pattern. To assert is indicating that if there is no cbranch
pattern there has to be a cmp patt
Christian Grössler writes:
> Sorry, the line numbers in the ICE are wrong, since I added some debug
> messages.
> The abort happens here in prepare_cmp_insn():
>
> /* Handle a libcall just for the mode we are using. */
> libfunc = optab_libfunc (cmp_optab, mode);
> gcc_assert
On 28.12.10 00:22, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Christian Grössler writes:
Looking at the history of optabs.c, the MODE_CC test was introduced when
merging the cond-optab branch
to main. I didn't find a description of the cond-optab branch and what it was
supposed to do.
This is the description
Christian Grössler writes:
> Looking at the history of optabs.c, the MODE_CC test was introduced when
> merging the cond-optab branch
> to main. I didn't find a description of the cond-optab branch and what it was
> supposed to do.
This is the description of the now-merged cond-optab branch, f
Hello,
I'm trying to make a port to a new architecture work on the current gcc. There
hasn't been any work
done on this port since Nov-2008.
The compiler builds now, but I'm getting an ICE when I try to compile a program.
-
X:
--
(mem/f/c/i:PSI (plus:PSI (reg/f:PSI 87 virtual-stack-var
