On 22 June 2015 at 10:18, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf
>> Of Julian Klappenbach
>> Sent: 21 June 2015 16:56
>> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: Possibl
> -Original Message-
> From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf
> Of Julian Klappenbach
> Sent: 21 June 2015 16:56
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Possible range based 'for' bug
>
> Version info:
>
> Configured
On 21 June 2015 at 19:16, Julian Klappenbach wrote:
> The issue occurred to me after I sent the email.
>
> begin() / end() return iterators by value, not reference.
>
> So, you're correct in identifying the value / reference issue. But to
> be precise: you can't return an abstract class type *by
The issue occurred to me after I sent the email.
begin() / end() return iterators by value, not reference.
So, you're correct in identifying the value / reference issue. But to
be precise: you can't return an abstract class type *by value* from a
function. If the return values of begin() / end
On 21 June 2015 at 16:56, Julian Klappenbach wrote:
> Version info:
>
> Configured with:
> --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr
> --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1
> Apple LLVM version 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.53) (based on LLVM 3.6.0svn)
> Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.3.0
Version info:
Configured with:
--prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1
Apple LLVM version 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.53) (based on LLVM 3.6.0svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin14.3.0
Thread model: posix
I'm using the default build provided by bre
