2010/1/19 Simon Hill:
> Axel Quote:
> "Anyways there is an already filed GCC bug about this defect report
> against the standard,
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131 ."
>
> That bug report is suspended. Is this due to the C++ standards issue
> you referred to?:
> http://www.open-std
Axel Quote:
"Anyways there is an already filed GCC bug about this defect report
against the standard,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131 ."
That bug report is suspended. Is this due to the C++ standards issue
you referred to?:
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.h
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Simon Hill wrote:
> I'm pretty sure this is a bug but I'd like a confirmation (or
> refutation) before I submit a bug report.
>
First the issue here is what namespace does the foundental types in
C++ have? The standard says none which makes this code invalid but
Re Axel:
Quote (Axel):
"Well, I think g++ behaves correctly. As I understand the standard,
the normal function foo(int) can't be used in the template "bar",
because it is only declared afterwards."
Me:
I don't think this can be correct. Removing the template foo() but
leaving the normal one also
Hi
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:37:34PM +1300, Simon Hill wrote:
> http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=559287
>
> SOURCE
>
> template
> void foo(pTYPE arg)
> { arg.nid(); }
>
> template
> void bar()
> {
> pTYPE var;
> foo(var);
>
http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=559287
SOURCE
template
void foo(pTYPE arg)
{ arg.nid(); }
template
void bar()
{
pTYPE var;
foo(var);
}
void foo(int)
{}
int main()
{
int i;
foo(i); // OK: Resolves foo(int
