On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:16:48AM -0400, Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
> Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
>
> > I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
> > external static or dynamic library.
>
> > In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
> > implement
Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
> I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
> external static or dynamic library.
> In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
> implementation (in my example, for "write"). But if the linker or
> dynamic linker resolves
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 07:19:43AM -0400, Dimitry Golubovsky wrote:
>
> I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
> external static or dynamic library.
>
> In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
> implementation (in my example, for "write").
I need to declare a symbol which is weaker in the executable than in any
external static or dynamic library.
In other words, the executable provides some fallback function
implementation (in my example, for "write"). But if the linker or
dynamic linker resolves it, the symbol definition from an
