On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Michael Meissner wrote:
> All of my comments about the internals of the mep would be things to do
> if you desired, but as port maintainer, I don't see that we have to
> apply standards set for the rest of the compiler (if we did, probably
> half of the ports would be rejected
> I thought I had sent you mail approving the changes 2 weeks ago.
> Perhaps I misremembered, or perhaps it got lost somewhere. All of
> my comments about the internals of the mep would be things to do if
> you desired, but as port maintainer, I don't see that we have to
> apply standards set for
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 12:52:33AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > Pending initial (technical) approval
>
> Ping? Still waiting for technical approval from a global maintainer.
>
> http://people.redhat.com/dj/mep/
I thought I had sent you mail approving the changes 2 weeks ago. Perhaps I
misre
> Pending initial (technical) approval
Ping? Still waiting for technical approval from a global maintainer.
http://people.redhat.com/dj/mep/
