--- Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:36:59AM +0200, Bernardo
> Innocenti wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:10:39AM +0200,
> Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> > >>
> > >>So it seems adding coldfire-linux is the only
> way
> > >>t
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 09:36:59AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:10:39AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >>
> >>So it seems adding coldfire-linux is the only way
> >>to address this...
> >
> > Why? Adding support (if it isn't already
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:10:39AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
>>
>>So it seems adding coldfire-linux is the only way
>>to address this...
>
> Why? Adding support (if it isn't already there) for something like
> --with-arch=coldfire should work just as well.
But h
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:10:39AM +0200, Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
> >>What are the changes you need to apply?
> >>
> >>Would plain 68020 code run on v4e processor? As far
> >>as I can see, m68k-linux isn't a multilib target.
> >
> >
> > Problem occurs mainly due to restricted addressing
> > mo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> - You don't seem to consistently patch both
>>MOTOROLA and !MOTOROLA paths.
>> Is this intentional? AFAIK, there are no
>> ColdFire targets using the MIT syntax,
>> but we need to be consistent;
>
> I think it is only for the new patterns that these
> paths are not f
Hi,
> > Attached are the patches for coldfire v4e. These
> > changes are originally contributed by Peter
> Barada. I
> > have migrated and tested these changes from gcc
> 3.04
> > to gcc 3.4 and now to mainline.
>
> Thank you for submitting this patch. I&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Attached are the patches for coldfire v4e. These
> changes are originally contributed by Peter Barada. I
> have migrated and tested these changes from gcc 3.04
> to gcc 3.4 and now to mainline.
Thank you for submitting this patch. I've not ye
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> Sorry, I missed ChangeLog patches.
There seems to be a bogus hunk in this patch.
The long lines need to be wrapped to 80 characters.
Also, one line is indented with spaces instead of
TABs.
--
// Bernardo Innocenti - Develer S.r.l., R&D dept.
\X/ http://www.d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Attached are the patches for coldfire v4e. These
changes are originally contributed by Peter Barada. I
have migrated and tested these changes from gcc 3.04
to gcc 3.4 and now to mainline.
Since coldfire v4e has MMU we need to support
m68k-linux target for coldfire
Hi,
Sorry, I missed ChangeLog patches.
Regards,
C Jaiprakash
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> Attached are the patches for coldfire v4e. These
> changes are originally contributed by Peter Barada.
> I
> have migrated and tested these changes from gcc 3.04
> to gcc 3.4 a
10 matches
Mail list logo
