Re: Patch reviews for 4.1

Middle-End -- >> >> [snip approvals] This only leaves out the two patches for 23948 and 24365, which are both showstoppers; plus 24408, whose audit trail says it's rather hard to fix it in 4.1. Paolo

RE: Patch reviews for 4.1

Mark Mitchell wrote: > This rather horrid URL: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type= allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.1&target_milestone=4.0.3&target_milestone=4.1.0&kn own_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_ty pe=allword

Re: Patch reviews for 4.1

Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Middle-End > -- > 23109 > 23948 These are the same patch, and it's too complicated for me. > 24365 Looks plausible but I don't understand the code well enough. > 24483 Approved. > 24589 Approved. > 23155 Approved. > 24408 The followup

Re: Patch reviews for 4.1

Mark Mitchell wrote: This rather horrid URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.1&target_milestone=4.0.3&target_milestone=4.1.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr

Patch reviews for 4.1

This rather horrid URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=4.1&target_milestone=4.0.3&target_milestone=4.1.0&known_to_fail_type=allwordssubstr&known_to_work_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_lo