On 10/20/22 13:31, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:39:25 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Oops, I was thinking this was in gcc as well. In libcpp there's
_cpp_valid_utf8 (which calls one_utf8_to_cppchar).
This routine has a lot more logic (including UCN decoding) and the
`one_utf8_to
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 11:39:25 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Oops, I was thinking this was in gcc as well. In libcpp there's
> _cpp_valid_utf8 (which calls one_utf8_to_cppchar).
This routine has a lot more logic (including UCN decoding) and the
`one_utf8_to_cppchar` also supports out-of-bounds
On 10/18/22 08:18, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 07:42:43 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 17:04:09 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Can we share utf8 parsing code with decode_utf8_char in pretty-print.cc?
I can look at factoring that out. I'll have to decode its logi
On 10/18/22 14:22, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 13:08:46 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 16:21 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>> David Malcolm would probably know best about JSON wrangling.
>>
>> Unfortunately our JSON output doesn't make any guarantees about the
On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 13:08:46 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 16:21 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > David Malcolm would probably know best about JSON wrangling.
>
> Unfortunately our JSON output doesn't make any guarantees about the
> ordering of keys within an object, so th
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 07:42:43 -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 17:04:09 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > Can we share utf8 parsing code with decode_utf8_char in pretty-print.cc?
>
> I can look at factoring that out. I'll have to decode its logic to see
> how much overlap there
On Mon, 2022-10-10 at 16:21 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/4/22 11:11, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > This patch adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a format
> > for
> > describing C++ module requirements and provisions based on the
> > source
> > code. This is required because compiling C
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 17:04:09 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 10/4/22 11:12, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> > This patch implements support for [P1689R5][] to communicate to a build
> > system the C++20 module dependencies to build systems so that they may
> > build `.gcm` files in the proper order.
>
>
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 21:12:03 +0200, Harald Anlauf wrote:
> Am 04.10.22 um 17:12 schrieb Ben Boeckel:
> > This patch implements support for [P1689R5][] to communicate to a build
> > system the C++20 module dependencies to build systems so that they may
> > build `.gcm` files in the proper order.
On 10/4/22 11:12, Ben Boeckel wrote:
This patch implements support for [P1689R5][] to communicate to a build
system the C++20 module dependencies to build systems so that they may
build `.gcm` files in the proper order.
Thanks!
Support is communicated through the following three new flags:
-
On 10/4/22 11:11, Ben Boeckel wrote:
This patch adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a format for
describing C++ module requirements and provisions based on the source
code. This is required because compiling C++ with modules is not
embarrassingly parallel and need to be ordered to ens
Am 04.10.22 um 17:12 schrieb Ben Boeckel:
This patch implements support for [P1689R5][] to communicate to a build
system the C++20 module dependencies to build systems so that they may
build `.gcm` files in the proper order.
Is there a reason that you are touching so many frontends?
diff --gi
This patch adds initial support for ISO C++'s [P1689R5][], a format for
describing C++ module requirements and provisions based on the source
code. This is required because compiling C++ with modules is not
embarrassingly parallel and need to be ordered to ensure that `import
some_module;` can be s
This patch implements support for [P1689R5][] to communicate to a build
system the C++20 module dependencies to build systems so that they may
build `.gcm` files in the proper order.
Support is communicated through the following three new flags:
- `-fdeps-format=` specifies the format for the out
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 15:51, nick wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2019-01-07 10:44 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 15:42, nick wrote:
> >>
> >> Greetings All,
> >>
> >> I was wondering as I sent a patch before the holidays if I should resend it
> >> as I did not get any replies.
> >
> > W
On 2019-01-07 10:44 a.m., Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 15:42, nick wrote:
>>
>> Greetings All,
>>
>> I was wondering as I sent a patch before the holidays if I should resend it
>> as I did not get any replies.
>
> Which patch? I don't see any patch from you that didn't get som
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019 at 15:42, nick wrote:
>
> Greetings All,
>
> I was wondering as I sent a patch before the holidays if I should resend it
> as I did not get any replies.
Which patch? I don't see any patch from you that didn't get some replies.
Greetings All,
I was wondering as I sent a patch before the holidays if I should resend it
as I did not get any replies.
Thanks,
Nick
18 matches
Mail list logo
