Re: PR target/30961 (was: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04))

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:40:00PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > H.J. Lu wrote: > > > Yes, it works for me. I tested it on Linux/ia32, Linux/intel64 > > and linux/ia64. There are no regressions. > > Thanks for testing! > > > gcc/ > > > > 2007-11-06 Ulrich Weigand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >

Re: PR target/30961 (was: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04))

H.J. Lu wrote: > Yes, it works for me. I tested it on Linux/ia32, Linux/intel64 > and linux/ia64. There are no regressions. Thanks for testing! > gcc/ > > 2007-11-06 Ulrich Weigand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PR target/30961 > * reload1.c (find_reloads): Also check in_reg when handli

Re: PR target/30961 (was: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04))

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 03:30:04PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > Mark Mitchell wrote: > > H.J. Lu wrote: > > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01865.html > > > > > > which involves reload. > > > > I'm not going to try to wade into reload. Ulrich, Eric, Ian -- would > > one of

PR target/30961 (was: Re: GCC 4.3.0 Status Report (2007-11-04))

Mark Mitchell wrote: > H.J. Lu wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg01865.html > > > > which involves reload. > > I'm not going to try to wade into reload. Ulrich, Eric, Ian -- would > one of you please review this patch? @@ -1821,6 +1835,18 @@ find_reg (struct insn_chain