On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:35:05PM -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 09:34 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:14:17PM -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2012 02:04 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
Hello,
As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for e
On 02/23/2012 09:34 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:14:17PM -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
On 02/23/2012 02:04 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
Hello,
As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for example recently in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02269.html
===
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:14:17PM -0500, Patrick Marlier wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 02:04 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for example recently in:
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02269.html
>>
>> === boehm-gc tests ===
>> Running
On 02/23/2012 02:04 PM, Patrick Marlier wrote:
Hello,
As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for example recently in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02269.html
=== boehm-gc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
=
Hello,
As I see in my x86_64/linux gcc build and for example recently in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg02269.html
=== boehm-gc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
=== boehm-gc Summ