On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> [Cc to the gcc mailing-list]
>
> On 2009-09-25 02:18:55 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > Also, as EXP_BITS is the full (biased) exponent size, it seems that
> > the real.c comment is buggy (27 -> 26).
>
> Looking at the history:
>
> -#define EXP_BITS
[Cc to the gcc mailing-list]
On 2009-09-25 02:18:55 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Also, as EXP_BITS is the full (biased) exponent size, it seems that
> the real.c comment is buggy (27 -> 26).
Looking at the history:
Index: real.h