On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 11:40 +1000, Brendon Costa wrote:
> Thank you for the information. It sounds like this is almost what I am
> looking for. I require hooks into the C GENERIC transformation stage
> (before GENERIC is transformed into GIMPLE). The paper mentioned that
> this is not yet done but
Ben Elliston wrote:
> I'm not sure how GEM (another Stony Book University project) relates to
> the talk given at this year's GCC Summit, but there was a talk about a
> plug-in architecture for GCC to allow modules to operate on the GIMPLE
> IR ("Extending GCC with Modular GIMPLE Optimisations" by
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 17:00 +1000, Brendon Costa wrote:
> I have a project that could benefit a lot from using something similar
> to GEM (http://www.ecsl.cs.sunysb.edu/gem/). I have not used GEM (As
> doing so is pointless currently and thus my email), but to summarise for
> others not familiar w
Hi all,
I have a project that could benefit a lot from using something similar
to GEM (http://www.ecsl.cs.sunysb.edu/gem/). I have not used GEM (As
doing so is pointless currently and thus my email), but to summarise for
others not familiar with it following is an except from their website:
GEM i
