Re: Non-dwarf blocks detected by valgrind

2021-01-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 15:38 +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 15:05 +0100, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > > --4184-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info > > --4184-- When reading debug info from > > /home/ig25/lib64/libquadmath.so.0.0.0: > > --4184-- Ignoring non-Dwarf2

Re: Non-dwarf blocks detected by valgrind

2021-01-25 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc
Hi Tobias, which binutil version do you have? $ as -v GNU assembler version 2.35.1 (x86_64-suse-linux) using BFD version (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Leap 15.1) 2.35.1.20201123-lp151.3.12 I am asking because Jakub just submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/564206.

Re: Non-dwarf blocks detected by valgrind

2021-01-25 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi Thomas, which binutil version do you have? I am asking because Jakub just submitted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/564206.html If that does not help, it might be that valgrind simply does not like the DWARF which GCC now produces by default. Defaulting to 4: Well, on

Re: Non-dwarf blocks detected by valgrind

2021-01-25 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi, On Mon, 2021-01-25 at 15:05 +0100, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > $ valgrind --version > valgrind-3.15.0 > $ gfortran -g hello.f90 > $ valgrind ./a.out > [...] > --4184-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info > --4184-- When reading debug info from > /home/ig25/lib64/libgfortran.so.5.

Re: Non-dwarf blocks detected by valgrind

2021-01-25 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc
Hi Tobias, Does this constitute a regression? From your description, yes. Can you give more details how to reproduce it? $ cat hello.f90 print *,"Hello, world!" end $ valgrind --version valgrind-3.15.0 $ gfortran -g hello.f90 $ valgrind ./a.out [...] --4184-- WARNING: Serious error when