On Thu, 20 Oct 2022, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
> > 1. How should (...) be represented differently from unprototyped functions
> > so that stdarg_p and prototype_p handle it properly? Should I add a new
> > language-independent type flag (there are plenty spare) to use for this?
>
> I'd say u
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 1:54 AM Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> C2x allows variable-argument functions declared with (...) as parameters -
> no named arguments - as in C++. It *also* allows such functions to access
> their parameters, unlike C++, by relaxing the requirements on va_start so
> it no longer
C2x allows variable-argument functions declared with (...) as parameters -
no named arguments - as in C++. It *also* allows such functions to access
their parameters, unlike C++, by relaxing the requirements on va_start so
it no longer needs to be passed the name of the last named parameter.
M
