On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Osku Salerma wrote:
> Not sure what you mean by "have the branches locally" (SVK?), but a
> plain rename of a branch doesn't force new check-outs, people can use
> svn switch to point their working copies at the new branch name.
As far as I can experienced, svn switch does hav
On Nov 16, 2005 02:35 PM, Osku Salerma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure what you mean by "have the branches locally" (SVK?), but a
> plain rename of a branch doesn't force new check-outs, people can use
> svn switch to point their working copies at the new branch name.
But some people have th
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 08:35, Osku Salerma wrote:
> Not sure what you mean by "have the branches locally" (SVK?), but a
> plain rename of a branch doesn't force new check-outs, people can use
> svn switch to point their working copies at the new branch name.
Same thing. It forces people t
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 November 2005 21:17, Branko Äibej wrote:
>
> > Now that GCC has switched to SVN, and tag and branch names are for all
> > practical purposes in different namespaces, you could drop the "-branch"
> > suffix from new branch names.
> >
> Sure
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 21:17, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Now that GCC has switched to SVN, and tag and branch names are for all
> practical purposes in different namespaces, you could drop the "-branch"
> suffix from new branch names.
>
Sure. Done.
> (You could also rename old branches, but then
Could I make a small suggestion?
Now that GCC has switched to SVN, and tag and branch names are for all
practical purposes in different namespaces, you could drop the "-branch"
suffix from new branch names. That'll save 8 chars per branch URL; not
much, but the best you can do until we come up
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Diego Novillo wrote:
> Gerald, is this patch OK for svn.html?
Sure! Thanks for the summary and the patch, Diego.
(I believe someone still needs to update projects/ia64.html; as far
as I can see, it's quite a bit out of date...)
Gerald
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 22:18 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > --Boundary-00=_dwUeD1M6OcgA542
> > Content-Type: text/plain;
> > charset="us-ascii"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> >
> > This branch will act as a repository for new optimizations mostly
>
> --Boundary-00=_dwUeD1M6OcgA542
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
> This branch will act as a repository for new optimizations mostly meant to
> improve code generation on IA-64. However, some of the work c
This branch will act as a repository for new optimizations mostly meant to
improve code generation on IA-64. However, some of the work currently
going on should help other targets as well. For now, this will help
independent contributors to have a common code base to work with.
The branch wi
10 matches
Mail list logo
