Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-11-22 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > | I've merged the gcc_update change to 4.0 branch, 3.4 branch and > > Did you mean that gcc_release on those branches is now using SVN? > That does not seem to be the case. It's gcc_update I merged, not gcc_release. The main pre-SVN differences be

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-11-22 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 16:51 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: | > "Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: | > | | > | > contrib/ scripts have been updated in the new repository | > | | > | I've me

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-11-22 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 16:51 +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > "Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > | > | > contrib/ scripts have been updated in the new repository > | > | I've merged the gcc_update change to 4.0 branch, 3.4 branch and >

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-11-22 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: | | > contrib/ scripts have been updated in the new repository | | I've merged the gcc_update change to 4.0 branch, 3.4 branch and Did you mean that gcc_release on those branches is now using SVN? That do

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-30 Thread Mark Mitchell
Daniel Berlin wrote: > [ Mark, my emails to gcc-announce are dropped on the floor, can you > forward this there? ] I've posted a slightly more user-centric announcement. I hope that's OK. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] (916) 791-8304

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-30 Thread Mark Mitchell
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > >>contrib/ scripts have been updated in the new repository > > > I've merged the gcc_update change to 4.0 branch, 3.4 branch and > csl-arm-branch. In so doing, bug 20731 is fixed since the branch name is > no longer hardc

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-28 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin wrote: > contrib/ scripts have been updated in the new repository I've merged the gcc_update change to 4.0 branch, 3.4 branch and csl-arm-branch. In so doing, bug 20731 is fixed since the branch name is no longer hardcoded. I have therefore also applied the

RE: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-28 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 18:25 +0100, Dave Korn wrote: > Mike Stump wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2005, at 9:20 AM, Dave Korn wrote: > >> snip > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /gnu/HEAD> svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/ > >> trunk > >> Enter passphrase for key '/home/

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-28 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 09:45 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 28, 2005, at 9:20 AM, Dave Korn wrote: > > snip > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /gnu/HEAD> svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/ > > trunk > > Enter passphrase for key '/home/dk/.ssh/id_rsa': > > > >

RE: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-28 Thread Dave Korn
Mike Stump wrote: > On Oct 28, 2005, at 9:20 AM, Dave Korn wrote: >> snip >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] /gnu/HEAD> svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/ >> trunk >> Enter passphrase for key '/home/dk/.ssh/id_rsa': >> >> [ 40 minutes later, no response and

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-28 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 19:22 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > contrib/ scripts have been updated in the new repository > > It appears this happend only on the trunk. > Yes. I will udpate them on branches as well. > Andreas. >

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-28 Thread Andreas Schwab
Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > contrib/ scripts have been updated in the new repository It appears this happend only on the trunk. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-28 Thread Mike Stump
On Oct 28, 2005, at 9:20 AM, Dave Korn wrote: snip [EMAIL PROTECTED] /gnu/HEAD> svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/ trunk Enter passphrase for key '/home/dk/.ssh/id_rsa': [ 40 minutes later, no response and still waiting ] ---

Re: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-28 Thread DJ Delorie
> Should I assume that the reason that my attempt to "svn co" the > repository for the first time is that the repository is massively > overloaded due to everyone on the list hitting it at the same time? Mine started right away. Checkout proceeding normally.

RE: New SVN repo is up

2005-10-28 Thread Dave Korn
Daniel Berlin wrote: > [ Mark, my emails to gcc-announce are dropped on the floor, can you > forward this there? ] > > The new SVN repository is up. snip [EMAIL PROTECTED] /gnu/HEAD> svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/svn/gcc/trunk Enter passphrase for ke

New SVN repo is up

2005-10-28 Thread Daniel Berlin
[ Mark, my emails to gcc-announce are dropped on the floor, can you forward this there? ] The new SVN repository is up. I will rescript the cvs sessions in wwwdocs, and post the final set of wwwdocs changes. contrib/ scripts have been updated in the new repository maintainer-scripts/ have as we