Re: NOP_EXPR vs. CONVERT_EXPR

2023-12-07 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 1:24 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On 12/5/23 07:53, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:54 PM Alexander Monakov via Gcc > > wrote: > >> > >> Greetings, > >> > >> the definitions for NOP_EXPR and CONVERT_EXPR in tree.def, having survived > >> all the way

Re: NOP_EXPR vs. CONVERT_EXPR

2023-12-07 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc
On 12/5/23 07:53, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote: On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:54 PM Alexander Monakov via Gcc wrote: Greetings, the definitions for NOP_EXPR and CONVERT_EXPR in tree.def, having survived all the way from 1992, currently say: /* Represents a conversion of type of a value.

Re: NOP_EXPR vs. CONVERT_EXPR

2023-12-05 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 3:54 PM Alexander Monakov via Gcc wrote: > > Greetings, > > the definitions for NOP_EXPR and CONVERT_EXPR in tree.def, having survived > all the way from 1992, currently say: > > /* Represents a conversion of type of a value. >All conversions, including implicit

NOP_EXPR vs. CONVERT_EXPR

2023-12-05 Thread Alexander Monakov via Gcc
Greetings, the definitions for NOP_EXPR and CONVERT_EXPR in tree.def, having survived all the way from 1992, currently say: /* Represents a conversion of type of a value. All conversions, including implicit ones, must be represented by CONVERT_EXPR or NOP_EXPR nodes. */ DEF