On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:14:48AM -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On 4/20/2015 5:04 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > On 19 April 2015 at 03:06, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> >> Is it one of the standard g++ or libstdc++ test cases that is failing? I
> >> could check what nios2-elf does with it if I
On 4/20/2015 5:04 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 19 April 2015 at 03:06, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> Is it one of the standard g++ or libstdc++ test cases that is failing? I
>> could check what nios2-elf does with it if I knew what to look for.
> Libstdc++ does not use the __sync built-ins in the
On 19 April 2015 at 03:06, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> Is it one of the standard g++ or libstdc++ test cases that is failing? I
> could check what nios2-elf does with it if I knew what to look for.
Libstdc++ does not use the __sync built-ins in the 4.9 branch, it has
switched to the __atomic ones wh
On 04/18/2015 09:06 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 04/18/2015 07:35 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
with nios2-rtems on gcc 4.9.2, we are getting undefineds
for some atomic primitives. Are these implemented or is
some magic bit of configurery missing for nios-rtems?
__sync_fetch_and_add_4 is missi
On 04/18/2015 07:35 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi
with nios2-rtems on gcc 4.9.2, we are getting undefineds
for some atomic primitives. Are these implemented or is
some magic bit of configurery missing for nios-rtems?
__sync_fetch_and_add_4 is missing on a simple C++ IO streams
sanity test.
libg
Hi
with nios2-rtems on gcc 4.9.2, we are getting undefineds
for some atomic primitives. Are these implemented or is
some magic bit of configurery missing for nios-rtems?
__sync_fetch_and_add_4 is missing on a simple C++ IO streams
sanity test.
Thanks
-- Joel Sherrill
Ask me about RTEMS: a free
